Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01127
Original file (MD04-01127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD04-01127

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040701. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041222. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.6.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I asked to be discharged to work things out with my wife. I should have never left the Marine Corps. That was the worst thing that ever happened to me. I miss being a Marine. There is nothing more that I would love than to once again be a United States Marine. So I ask the board to please overturn my discharge so that I may once again serve my Country. My future plans are as follows: I am currently enrolled in the summer semester Police Academy at Northeastern Junior College located here in Sterling Colorado. After I graduate from the academy I plan to work for the Sterling Police Department as an officer. I also plan to enlist as a reservist. I have learned from my mistakes and plan to make something of myself. Changing my discharge is just one of many step that I have to take on this life changing journey. Thank you for your consideration.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Police records check dtd 030402
Employer reference dtd 020322
Police Academy Certificate dtd 030717
Peace Officer Certificate dtd 031015
Northeaster student transcript
Firearms Course certificate dtd 030816
Arrest Control certificate dtd 030816
Driving Course certificate 030816
HAZMAT Awareness certificate dtd July 2003
Police Academy Certificate dtd 030816
OCAT Basic Course Certificate dtd 030816

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                950623 - 960528  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 960529               Date of Discharge: 991223

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 06 25
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 72

 Highest Rank: LCpl                         MOS: 0861

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2                           Conduct: 4.2 [Extracted from SJA ltr of 991124]

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 3

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.6.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970219:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Dereliction of duties and apathetic attitude towards scholastic studies.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

980212:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Spec 1: Disobey a lawful order from Cpl M_. Spec 2: Disobey lawful order from SSgt S_ .
         Award: Forfeiture of $539 per month for 1 month(s), restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.

990514:  Intervention and Treatment Branch Case Review on spoual abuse case of 8 April 99. Substantiated Level IV.

990602:  Intervention and Treatment Branch Case Review on child abuse case of 8 April 99. Substantiated child endangerment of eight month old and two year old dependents. Recommend 52 Week Domestic Violence Program, New Parent Support Program, Referral to Mental Health, Individual Counseling, MPO to remain in effect.

991014:  Applicant assigned to liberty risk program.

 991013:  Psychiatric Evaluations:
                  AXIS I:
Occupational and Partner Relation Problems
                            Alcohol Abuse
                           Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood
                  AXIS II:
                           Narcissistic Personality Disorder
                  AXIS III:
                           Hx of Asthma
 Recommendation: Fit for duty but a continuing danger to himself by suicide therefore recommend expeditious administrative separation.
991025:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Insubordinate conduct while addressing seniors and being UA from appointed place of duty.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
991109:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and by reason of personality disorder as evidenced by substantiated domestic violence and the recommendation of the division psychologist.
991109:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
991110:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and by reason of a personality disorder. The factual basis for this recommendation was the substantiated case of domestic violence and recommendations of the division psychologist.

991210:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

000103:  GCMCA [CG, 3MARDIV] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19991223 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. When the service of a Marine has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Article 91 of the UCMJ. The Applicant was counseled for insubordinate conduct. There is also evidence of substantiated domestic violence to include spousal abuse and child endangerment. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that his discharge was appropriate and that his evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the conduct for which he was discharged. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. Relief denied.

Concerning reenlistment, the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until 30 Jan 97).

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 128, assault.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501226

    Original file (MD0501226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and/or from an attached document/letter to the Board:“Application for correction of military record under the provisions of title 10, U. S. code, section 1552 (5, 6) Application for the review of discharge from the Armed Forces of the Unites States (6):I, R_ E_ K_(Applicant), would like to request that my discharge determination of Other than Honorable be changed to a Medical...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01205

    Original file (MD02-01205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01205 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020823, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed. The Board will determine which reason for discharge should have been assigned based upon the facts and circumstances before the Board, including the service regulations governing the reasons for discharge at that time, to determine whether relief is warranted. Applicant was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00947

    Original file (MD04-00947.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition. 030610: Commanding Officer recommended that the Applicant’s suspended discharge be vacated due to continued domestic violence incidents.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00100

    Original file (MD03-00100.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00100 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021016, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Since this eval the pt has had continued difficulties with his peers and authority figures at work. 000503: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01087

    Original file (MD03-01087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01087 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030605. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 000210: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by involvement in Domestic Disturbances, dismissal from the Men’s Educational Program, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00298

    Original file (MD04-00298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00298 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031202. Applicant is non-amenable to any type of treatment program at this time and appears to only want to prolong his stay in the Marine Corps.020411: Medical Officer diagnosis that Applicant is alcohol dependent, recommends intensive outpatient treatment program.020517: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant has been...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00309

    Original file (MD99-00309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00309 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981222, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to end of active service. 970430: Applicant issued a Letter of Probation concerning unsatisfactory performance of assigned duty as a Marine Recruiter. Member reported suicidal ideation for post 4 days due to wife returning home mentioning she was leaving him and taking his daughter.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600339

    Original file (MD0600339.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant acknowledged understanding of right to 3 days between notification and administrative discharge board, waived this right and wished to proceed with the administrative board at the proposed time.991216: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, minor disciplinary infractions, and personality disorder, that such misconduct warranted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00065

    Original file (ND99-00065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board will not grant relief on the basis of these issues.The applicant is reminded that the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600227

    Original file (ND0600227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00227 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051116. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. I’m asking for my discharge to be